As I stated in my Review of
Nadine Harris’s The
Deepest Well, every mental health
professional should know that adverse (traumatic) childhood experiences (ACE’s)
- especially with parents who are abusive, neglectful, are perpetrators or
victims of domestic violence, have multiple partners, or have substance abuse
issues - are a major risk factor for children developing many different
psychiatric disorders, as well as being a risk factor for a variety of physical
illnesses. Yet therapists and psychiatrists often ignore this issue in favor of
theories about some sort of genetically-caused, pre-existing brain disorder.
In this fascinating book, the author also makes the case for the importance of ACE’s, especially in the case of pediatric psychiatric conditions, by examining the physiological effects of trauma on brain development. There is an extensive literature on this, although most of it neglects the fact that a continued relationship with an abusive or formerly abusive parent is usually continuing in some form throughout much of these patients’ adult life.
In any event, the author points out that organized psychiatry in 2011 refused
to acknowledge that “…childhood adverse experiences lead to substantial
developmental disruptions” and added that the idea that it is is “more clinical intuition
than research-based fact.” They then added, “There is no known evidence of
developmental disruptions that were preceded in time in a causal fashion by any
type of trauma syndrome.” (From the American Psychiatric Association rejection
of a Developmental Trauma Disorder diagnosis, as quoted in the book).
That last part
is misleading if not an outright lie. We don’t have high caliber causal evidence
on the causes of just about any diagnosis in the
DSM. Van Der Kolk has a list of references from an extensive literature on the
enduring negative effects of early maltreatment. ACE’s are a major contributor
to a variety of psychiatric symptoms
that are part and parcel of the genesis of many different psychiatric
disorders. Especially the childhood ones like ADHD, conduct disorder, and
oppositional defiant disorder, as well as many of the mood and anxiety disorders.
This blindness by the psychiatric community has led to what is called “malignant polypharmacy” – the tendency of some psychiatrists and psychiatric nurse practitioners to confuse symptoms that appear in different forms within a variety of different psychiatric diagnosis as instead being co-morbid (co-occurring) conditions. When I was in practice, I would find new patients who were on several different psych medications – sometimes including both uppers and downers simultaneously – because new drugs were added whenever the practitioner noticed additional, seemingly untreated symptoms.
Clinicians had misinterpreted these symptoms as
being due to their being indicative of other psychiatric disorders
that were not being addressed by the existing drug regimen. As the author
points out, what was really not being addressed is the underlying issue – the
history of abuse.
As mentioned, and as with the Deepest Well, this book unfortunately ignores the question of whether brain changes caused by ACE’s are at least partially reversible - were it not for continuing reinforcement of the trauma throughout the lives of the subjects of this literature. This question lurks in many of the book’s case examples and within the literature that the author quotes.
For example, he talks about a case where a woman continued to blame
herself for her father molesting her despite her rational mind knowing full
well that this was nonsense. He describes traumatized firefighters who were “desperately
trying to protect the system.” As part of a suggestion for criteria for a proposed
diagnosis of developmental trauma disorder, he included, “Intense preoccupation with the safety of the
caretaker or other loved ones.” He even describes himself as mistakenly
thinking that his own parents no longer had a major influence on him!
In the numerous,
highly interesting case examples, Van Der Kolk omits mention of whether or not the
patient still maintained contact with abusive parents. The closest he comes is
a statement on page 210 about a perpetrator "hopefully" not still being around
to hurt a traumatized individual.
Nonetheless,
this well-written and almost entertaining book is a good introduction to the
consequences of ACE’s on psychological and brain development, as well as
introducing some possible therapeutic ways to treat traumatized patients. Van
der Kolk is a master story teller.
I find your blog to be very educational right and it clears up alot of the weird and strange things I have read about or heard about in the field. i once had a therapist who I belive was psychotic and talked about her two inner children fighting in her head. She told me to tell my two inner children to stop fighting guys and when I had a panic attack she asked me who put a pillow overr my head. It is funny now but at the time it took away invailable resources and time away from competent help. Now I have come to believe she had Schizotypal PD because of her bizarre and peculair beliefs and thinking. She really believed she was a good therapist.
ReplyDeleteSounds like the therapist was taking her metaphors a little too literally.
DeleteOn another note Dr Allen. My father had BPD and I stayed and gave him another chance. He was an invluable resource to me for many things. He had bad behaviours and we discussed it. He usually came around because he trusted me and believed me. I set boundaries and told him what I liked and didnt like and he respected mine. He also said he learned how to love with my daughter and he did. It all turned out well. I went on with my life and lived it to how I myself do not like the therapists who think because I had a BPD parent I must have all this pathology and I dont and never did.
ReplyDeleteThe phrase "if you have this you MUST have that" is invariably nonsense. All cases are different in terms of severity, intractability, whether grandparents are still around and factoring in, how many siblings are around and if one or more of them are taking on the brunt of the parental ambivalence while the others escape relatively untouched, and probably a hundred other factors.
DeleteDave, I wanted your professional belief on cognitive therapy. To me they use it like a cult and think it is the panacea for everthing. I dont believe it alot of it and you can change your thinking without using it.
ReplyDeleteCognitive therapists are in the dark about the true nature of the irrational thoughts they are always challenging. They don't know that these thoughts have a purpose - to discourage a person from stepping out of their family and kin group's groupthink. If their efforts to assert themselves aren't TOO controversial in the family, then cognitive therapy can help a person ignore the thoughts. But if the new thoughts are met with massive family invalidation, then the therapists are wasting their time. I even saw a video of Aaron Beck, one of the two founders of cognitive therapy, challenging the thoughts of a patient who kept on saying: "I KNOW the thoughts are irrational; I just can't stop thinking them." Beck just kept on challenging the rationality of his patient's thoughts!
Delete