Pages

Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Psychiatric Disorders

 


In my last post, I mentioned that the American Psychiatric Association rejected the diagnosis of Developmental Trauma Disorder in 2011, and refused to acknowledge that “…childhood adverse experiences lead to substantial developmental disruptions” and added that this idea is “more clinical intuition than research-based fact.”

In fact, there have been numerous studies showing a correlation between ACEs and a wide variety of clinical conditions. Below are brief descriptions of the results of four studies, recently published, addressing this contention. One is a review and meta-analysis, which is a research process used to systematically synthesize or merge the findings of, in this case, 39 (!) single, independent studies, using statistical methods to calculate an overall or 'absolute' effect.

Of course, the studies do only show correlations, which means that they do not “prove” that ACE’s actually cause psychiatric disorders or even symptoms. But the correlations are as good as any in the psychiatric research literature, which is pretty much minimal in findings that prove actual causation for almost every psychiatric disorder.

 

Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Adults With Eating Disorders: Comparison To A Nationally Representative Sample And Identification Of Trauma

The primary objectives of the current study were: (1) to examine and compare ACEs between two samples: treatment-seeking adults, and a nationally representative sample of adults, (2) to characterize ACEs items and total scores across demographic and diagnostic information in adults seeking treatment for an ED, (3) to statistically classify ACEs profiles using latent class analysis, and (4) to examine associations between ACEs profiles and diagnosis.  Results: Patients with EDs had significantly higher ACEs scores than the nationally representative sample. Within patients with EDs, four latent classes of ACEs item endorsement were identified. Patients with other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) and binge eating disorder (BED) were more likely to fall into the "Household ACEs" and "Abuse ACEs" groups, respectively, compared to anorexia nervosa-restricting subtype (AN-R). Conclusion: Patients with EDs reported more ACEs than the nationally representative sample, across all ED diagnoses.

“Adverse childhood experiences among adults with eating disorders: comparison to a nationally representative sample and identification of trauma profiles.” Rienecke, Johnson et.al. Journal of Eating Disorders , volume 10, Article number: 72 (2022). 

 

Considerable Mental Health Burden Associated With Childhood Trauma

Trauma is associated with increased odds of anxiety disorders and any psychiatric disorder at age 6 years. There is a considerable mental health burden in association with childhood trauma. 

 “The association between childhood trauma and psychiatric disorders in low-income and middle-income Countries." Alckmin-Carvalho et. al., The Lancet Psychiatry, Oct. 31, 2022.


Association of Neural Connectome With Early Experiences of Abuse in Adults

In this cohort study of 768 participants, individuals with abuse experienced during childhood (but not adolescence) demonstrated an altered connectome [connections between brain neurons] of greater functional connectivity [changes in usual and not pathological connections in various brain areas] associated with somatomotor and dorsal-ventral attention brain networks, irrespective of current diagnosis or symptom state. These findings suggest that a history of child abuse is associated with altered functioning of systems responsible for perceptual processing and attention, and these findings were found in the presence of many different psychiatric conditions.

"Association of Neural Connectome With Early Experiences of Abuse in Adults." Korgaonkar et. al., JAMA Network Open. 2023;6.

 

A  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Childhood Adversity and Adult Psychiatric Disorder.

A review and analysis of 39 different studies suggests that childhood and adolescence is an important time for risk for later mental illness, and an important period in which to focus intervention strategies for those known to have been exposed to adversity, particularly multiple adversities. There was some evidence of a dose-response relationship with those exposed to multiple forms of maltreatment having more two and a half times odds of developing a mental disorder. 

“A revised and extended systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between childhood adversity and adult psychiatric disorder  [Review]." McKay et. al., Journal of Psychiatric Research, 156 (2022).





 

 




3 comments:

  1. I have a question off topic from your post. Years ago I joined a psychologist on line to learn about BPD. She seemed to know the disorder however she revealed herself as having many BPD and Narcisstic behaviours herself.One of the most unsettling things was that she was calling people with BPD dangerous a holes, crazy bitches and other mean language.I had three family members with the disorder and I cant imagine caling them such names. She also hung around a group of pick up artist men who used women and a guy who was designated as running a hate group.My question is how in the world does someone like that get to hold a liscense as a professional. It is unethical. She advocated getting angry at these people. I am not into anger and hate and I do not see that as any means of people helpful to oneself or to society at large. I found empathy and understanding of why they behaved that way in a dignified and respectful manner is what helped change the BPD. They feel low and worthless.Call me responsible but I care about how I affect people and I do not feel the need to spread fear,, hate and anger. It is a personality disordered trait to malign a whole group of people and bash them.This supposed mental health professional was sexually abused by a woman.I think she should have dealt with that instead of going on and becoming antagonistic and hateful against a BPD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since she was online, it's possible that she may not actually be licensed. Are you sure? Certainly her behavior is unethical and any licensing board would investigate her if there were complaints about her - especially if there were several complaints. What you wrote about her hanging around with a group of pick-up artist men suggests that she is helping them target vulnerable women. Women with BPD are unlikely to speak up and/or be believed. Unethical therapists who sleep with patients use the same targeting strategy.

      Delete
    2. Thanks Dr Allen, I wondered if she was licensed. I simply do not know. A lot of people figured she was hinky and left. I agree that people with bpd arent given a voice. I have to say I feel better that you acknowledged how unethical her behaviour is. I never thought of it before but you are right she is enabling these pick up artists. Apparently there is a feminist conspiracy out there harming men through marriage so in her mind picking up and exploiting woman is acceptable. I thought that a professional who was in good standing had to be around moral people and not hate groups listed by the Southern Poverty Law or other immoral people

      Delete