Pages

Thursday, September 7, 2023

Book Review: Educated: A Memoir by Tara Westover




In 2019, I wrote a review of a book by Amber Scorah titled Leaving the Witness about a woman growing up as a member of a cult-like religion. People in that group were taught to avoid talking to anyone or looking at any source of information that might call into question its belief system. As with most cults, people who broke the rules or questioned orthodoxy were completely shunned by family and friends.

My interest was how people routinely convince themselves of the most outrageous beliefs - ones that could easily be seen as preposterous even if thought about briefly - and hang on to them for dear life in order to avoid an almost unbearable feeling of groundlessness (also called existential groundlessness or anomie). The roots of this are from the biological effects of an evolutionary process called kin selection. In my review I said I thought the author had written the most elegant descriptions of that experience I’d ever read.

Well, Ms. Scorah has met her match in Tara Westover. Furthermore, Westover’s book talks about what happens in a case in which the “cult” consists ONLY of the members of someone’s family of origin. They were ostensibly Mormons, but the vast majority of practitioners of that religion did not subscribe to many of the clearly bizarre ideas of this particular family, especially those of the author’s father.

Westover writes that he may have had bipolar disorder. Of course I have no way of knowing for sure, but the consistency of her descriptions of him argues against this. In true bipolar, the person thinks normally when not in a manic or depressed state, which is usually most of the time. Some of the father’s strange ideas did not seem to be delusions per se but were based on conspiracy theories that are now widely believed. Included were dramatic ideas about the “Illuminati” and an anti-Semitic tirade called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Other of his beliefs were even more far out: the public schools were all agents of Satin, so none of the seven children in the family attended public schools. All doctors were all part of this conspiracy, so no one was taken to a hospital. 

Mother always went along with whatever ideas were expressed by the Father, but when alone with the author, she would sometimes seem to indicate that indeed she knew better.

One of the biggest issues for the author was her relationship with her older brother Shawn, who was sometimes hyper-involved with her but at other times physically abusive to her. If she mentioned this to her parents, they did not seem to believe her, so she quickly learned to keep it to herself –sometimes even by telling herself that maybe she had dreamed it or that she was crazy so what had clearly happened was a figment of her imagination.

Strangely, Westover was able to get into BYU despite a paucity of education by studying for the college entrance exams, through books and other recommended sources from people she knew at her church. Most of this reading presumably would have been highly disapproved of by her father. It took her two tries at the test to get the requisite score, but she somehow kept at it. Her father has always said he thought that women should just get married and run a household, but as I will mention later, some of his behavior was inconsistent with that idea.

Once she got to BYU, a Mormon school, almost none of the students had the same belief system she did. They could hardly believe she had never even been to high school. She did not share anything about her unique family experiences. She frequently told herself she was not qualified to be there. Nonetheless, she was able to persist with the encouragement of some of her advisors who saw how bright she was. And she was bright enough to eventually get into highly competitive and prestigious graduate programs at Cambridge University in England, and at Harvard!

She frequently returned home and usually fell back into old family patterns, but something pushed her leave again and again to continue with her “satanic” education.

At school, the feelings and thoughts produced by her sense of groundlessness almost tore her apart, despite her ongoing successes. The way she experienced groundlessness was brilliantly described in a variety of amazing (and rather horrifying) ways throughout the book. Examples: she writes, “It was not that I had done something wrong, but I existed in the wrong way. There was something impure in the fact of my being.” 

When she started to experience her clique at Cambridge as a sort of family, she felt damned by those feelings: “No natural sister prefers a stranger to a brother…and what sort of daughter prefers a stranger to her own father? That feeling became a physical part of me.” Later she had the thought, “It seemed like I made a thousand mistakes, driven a thousand knives into the heart of my own family.”

The blow that stopped her from making frequent return home visits was after, in private e-mails, her mother admitted she should have protected her daughter from Shawn. And then her older sister admitted to her that she had been through many of the same things with Shawn that the author had. Even Shawn’s ex-girlfriend confirmed how he was. Surely now her Dad would believe her. Except in his presence, her mother and her sister started lying again, denying that they had said anything of the sort!

So how was the author able to break through the powerful effects of family dynamics and achieve her educational accomplishments? Again, I have no way of knowing for sure, so I'll speculate based on the available descriptions as well as my psychotherapy experience with other families. I could of course be completely wrong..

I suspect that her parents, despite any insistence otherwise, were both secretly highly conflicted about education, family roles, and religion, so she was getting a mixed message. The author does not tell us anything about her grandparents that might clue us in to where this confusion came from originally, but some of the parents' behavior seemed to scream it out. 

Some examples: as mentioned, father preached about traditional gender roles, and his only other daughter followed them. But somehow, when he had been injured and couldn’t run his business as before, he allowed his wife to develop her own business selling alternative medicines that brought in more money than he’d ever made, and he was supportive of her doing this. Also, when Tara started singing in local shows as a teen, he would always come to hear her sing, and appeared to be as proud as punch.

Mother, while not overtly telling the author to get educated, would often subtly push her into getting on with it – as long as Dad was not around. 

But the mind-blowing fact that seems most in line with my speculation is this: of seven siblings in the author’s family, three kids left the “homestead” and four stayed. The three who left got Ph.D.’s, while the four who stayed didn’t even have high school diplomas! The possible acting out of the ambivalence of this family thusly described in one sentence.


10 comments:

  1. Hi Dave, I was thinking today after posting to you how antisocial that shrinks thinking was and aggressive. He said he kinda wanted to kill one of his patients. A shrink. He gives people ultimatums and then calls it gentle something when it is really coercion. He says to make sure people do what he wants and he doesnt consider how the person would feel and I dont think he cares because he gets what he wants.One guy was embarrassed about a mild tremor he had in his hands and he told his therapy helper to make sure the guy goes into a department store raises his hands and to say look at my shaky hands. How embarrassing and humiliating would that be.You could have just talked to the guy and told him people dont care and he could have noticed on his own. This guy is a confrontation freak. He thinks going on railroad tracks and saying look at me is a good shame attacking exercise when I would feel like a damn fool. I guess demoralizing and humiliating yourself doesnt matter to him. He is a goofball with no social couth as narcissists dont have. He also thinks all interactons are on the person making them so other words it is you not the other person. I truly believe this guy is delusional and I dont think a Psychiatrist would have a problem agreeing with me either. I never met three narcissists in my life like I have the past 4 years. They truly live in an alternative reality and dont care about right and wrong much less morals a persons self esteem, self worth or their general well being. It is all about them and their weird ideas and what they want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like you had a really bad therapist. If you just want to message me about something, please e-mail me instead of writing at an unrelated post.

      Delete
  2. That was a good article.I dont believe in God because i believein scienceandreason My brother on the other hand believes in thedevil and all kinds of scary thingswith it.I said Ithought it was nuts be he denied it of course. SO i decided that he does legally have the right to believe in God and I dont want to hear about it if it doesnt get too crazy I dont mind. If it starts to lead into his schiophrenia I immedidatley intervene.I decided f40 year ago that someone had to be there for my brother because he as a real need for it if he loses insight and reality. Something has to be there thus studying the illness to become competent and deal with Psychiatrist. He truly is remarkable because when he get psychotic he does thinks that are destructive and can lead to more serious consequences all of course not meaning to He lose rational thinking judgement and the sense of right and wrong so I am on top of things for that. Somebody has to be responsible He gotten better with his thinking through the years and he does have Parnoid PD too so I know the difference between Schizophrenic paranoia personality disorder I have normal thinking so when the cable goes out I think oh call them he thinks someone is messing with them and uses no critical or reasoning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Self ambivelance forces people to disassociate. Do the kids that stayed have a higher level of ocd, codependency, or dissasociation and the parents are closer to those kids so those kids are risking and losing more if they go? In a family where two things cannot be true you need to be really good at repression.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a great question. I think they all have a high level of ambivalence, but probably different defense mechanisms liker dissociation. In therapy we can usually guess why certain siblings do one thing and another sibling something else and still others do not seem to be affected at all; we can't know for sure. Possible factors: innate temperament, looking like one of the grandparents. sibling position (oldest, youngest), and a bunch of others. See: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/matter-personality/201208/why-do-some-siblings-troubled-families-turn-out-fine-while-others

      Delete
    2. I read the book and just finished it. Thank you for mentioning it. When you say "innate temperment" is that biology that drives ones's overall moods? Is it genetic? The choice of your own self care or your family is very severe. I guess that is why my friend said to treat codependency as an autoimmune disease.

      Delete
    3. Yes, innate temperament is the natural level of reactivity (such as a colicky baby vs. a quiet one), attention span, tendency to become anxious, stress tolerance, and so on. These are all biological tendencies that are distributed on a bell shaped curve like most things. Psychiatry tends to think that high or low normal on the curve are representative of a disease Sort of like thinking every player in the NBA has a growth hormone disease named acromegaly. (Although a colicky baby and a conflicted mother is a bad combo - but that's a gene-environment interaction disorder). I like your friend's joke - hope no one minds if I steal it.

      Delete
  4. Please use the comment. Do you have any writing about colicky babies? Temperament? I appreciate your insight.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No, I haven't written anything about those topics other than saying that those things alone IMO do not cause psychiatric problems unless they also lead to problematic family interactions. There are literally thousands of genes that make certain behaviors a little more or less likely but alone do not cause behavior problems or intrapsychic conflicts. (And I'm not talking about things that I consider actual brain disorders like schizophrenia).

    ReplyDelete