When I write about dysfunctional
family dynamics on my blogs, in response I often get parents and adult children
reacting in completely opposite ways to the very same post: the parents think I
am putting the blame all on them, and the adult children likewise feel I’m
singling them out. Of course, the parents had the issues that are creating
difficulties before the kids ever came into existence, so this makes them
somewhat more responsible, but they are reacting to binds that they themselves were
put into by their own parents. In turn,
their parents were reacting to their parents, and so on.
Of course, when people feel
blamed for something they don’t really like, but sort of know they had
something to do with, they tend to feel guilty, which tends to make them
defensive. Defensiveness, in turn, causes them to tune out discussions of what
they might be able to do differently in order to fix the family problem. That
would be bad enough, but there is something else that amplifies this problem
even more. The fact that they felt guilty even before reading my stuff is often
the main problem that caused them to give off destructive double messages to
their kids in the first place.
The women’s movement was great in
terms of opening up fulfilling opportunities for women for which they are more
than qualified. However, it is also a big factor in creating a lot of parental
guilt as when both parents are working, this has made many of them feel like they are
neglecting their kids. As I have written, the Phyllis Schlaflys of the world
pile on the guilt. This cultural argument has two effects on the parents: anger
at their kids for complicating their lives, and attempts to make up for their
frequent absences by overindulging their kids and trying to be friends with
them.
The latter behavior creates all
the issues that parenting columnist John Rosemond has been writing about for
years: it makes the kids feel inadequate. My view on this is slightly different
than his: I think the kids start to believe that the parent’s constant need to
cater to them is evidence that the parents need
to be caretakers to remain mentally stable, so the children start to act as if they are inadequate so the parents
can continue to feel needed.
If the parents’ anger
predominates, this can lead to acting out by the child to provide the parent with
a feeling of justification for being angry and therefore not as guilt-ridden.
If the parents go back and forth
between compulsive caretaking and anger, the child develops one of the major characteristics
of borderline personality disorder: spoiling behavior. When the parent gets too
angry the child tries (and usually succeeds at) making the parent feel guilty,
but then when the parent feels too guilty, the child finds ways to make them
angrier.
Because the issue of parental
guilt is so central, this creates a conundrum for anyone trying to get the
family to discuss what is really going on so that it can be stopped or at least
minimized – including any family member attempting to do this, a therapist
trying to help the family, or a writer of blogs trying to get people to focus
on real issues rather than looking for scapegoats or facile explanations for
the self -defeating behavior of family members. When any of these folks bring
up what the parents are doing “wrong,” this tends to make the parents feel even
guiltier, which is the source of the problem in the first place. The problem then
gets even worse rather than better.
When I had such a parent in
therapy, I was able to find a way to finesse this, by discussing how their
child may be mis-reading them, which
tends to be a less guilt-inducing way to put it. Also, I can empathize with the
bind that the parents are themselves feeling, having formed a preliminary
hypothesis about why their own parents acted as they did.
This is much more difficult to accomplish
when writing for the public, because readers tend to quickly focus more on
anything that seems at first glance to be less than empathic with their own
plight. I do talk about how the problems have been passed down from prior
generations, so if we have to blame anyone, let’s blame Adam and Eve and be
done with it. I also make use of a great quote from John Rosemond: "Taking responsibility for
something and self-blame are horses of two entirely different colors. The
former is empowering; the latter is paralyzing." However, I can’t discuss
these ideas in detail in every single post or they would all be twice as long
as this one. And anyway, disclaimers like that are often ignored in the heat of the
moment.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I have bought and read your book after researching this issue myself for some time now, looking for answers. I have a question unrelated to this post... Do you think all sadistic and abusive people play the monster role in their families or are there other causes? Is there a conflict over kindness vs evil? Is sadistic and cruel behaviour also a form of distancing behaviour?
ReplyDeleteKind regards from a reader in Sweden
Hi Anonymous,
DeleteThanks for the question. No, I don't think that abusive people are necessarily playing any given role. It all depends on the behavior itself, the circumstances, how often it's done, and who it's generally directed against. Details matter.
However, it certainly can be used as distancing behavior.