Lately there have been a slew of articles about
"depression" that seem to go out of their way to avoid discussing any
specific psychiatric diagnosis listed in the DSM - instead strongly implying that
"depression" is itself a disorder. These articles appear in the
popular press, but, frighteningly, also in newsletters and newspapers for psychiatrists
and psychologists. They explore such questions as "Do antidepressants work?" and "What is better for depression, drugs or cognitive
behavioral therapy?"
These types of questions are completely meaningless.
Depression is discussed as if it were a single phenomenon that, at best, exists
on a continuum from "mild" to "moderate" to "severe."
This type of wording is in fact completely ignorant, but does not necessarily
reflect real ignorance. In many cases, different entities such as big Pharma
have a vested interest in conflating several different psychiatric conditions.
In truth, "depression" is just a mood state, and as
a symptom, it can be part of many different psychiatric disorders that are,
despite some overlap in symptomatology, as different as night and day when it
comes to their clinical presentations as well as their response to various
treatments.
To name but a few actual diagnoses, there is major depression
(both as part of unipolar and bipolar disorder), dysthymia, adjustment disorder
with depression, depression due to a medical condition, and depression due to a
substance. Medical conditions that can lead to depressive symptoms include hypothyroidism and some strokes. Substances that can do that include some steroids like prednisone and the "crash" that results when an acute cocaine high wears off.
Furthermore, "depression" as discussed in every day conversation can be a normal mood that is part of chronic unhappiness, or that occurs in response to grief at someone's death or due to any other loss or misfortune.
Furthermore, "depression" as discussed in every day conversation can be a normal mood that is part of chronic unhappiness, or that occurs in response to grief at someone's death or due to any other loss or misfortune.
The most important diagnostic distinction for this discussion is between major or clinical
depression and dysthymia. Although we don't know enough about the brain to know
the exact causes of either one, and there is some overlap in symptomatology, they
appear for the most part with very distinct clinical presentations, especially
in their classic forms.
Dysthymia appears to be more of a psychological reaction,
while major depression probably involves the more primitive part of the brain
called the limbic system. The latter, unlike the former, is accompanied by a
whole array of chronic, persistent (lasting all day every day for at least two
weeks), and pervasive (coloring all aspects of the patient's mental life) physical
symptoms - all at the same time - involving sleep, appetite, ability to
experience pleasure, energy level and motivation, and concentration. Sufferers may have an
unrelenting and constant sense of foreboding accompanied by inexplicable hopelessness and
helplessness. We used to refer to these types of symptoms as vegetative symptoms.
Furthermore, someone in a major depressive disorder episode reacts completely differently to life's every day ups and downs than they do when they are not in the middle of such an episode. It's almost Jeckyl and Hyde territory.
Furthermore, someone in a major depressive disorder episode reacts completely differently to life's every day ups and downs than they do when they are not in the middle of such an episode. It's almost Jeckyl and Hyde territory.
These people stay depressed no matter what life events occur around them. They could literally win the lottery and would not really feel a whole
lot better for more than a few minutes.
The most severe form of major depression is called melancholic depression. Most people who
have never worked in a mental hospital have never seen a case, but the anti-psychiatry
types who have not seen it blather on about depression incessantly as if they knew what
they were talking about.
People with melancholic depression exhibit something called psychomotor retardation. People with
this symptom move and think at a snail's pace.
It takes them longer to respond to any verbal interactions. They can
even appear to have significantly impaired memory, although it is actually a
more severe form of concentration impairment. That clinical picture is sometimes referred to as pseudodementia.
You cannot spend more
than an hour with such people without realizing that this condition has next to
nothing in common with the type of "depression" people see in their
everyday interactions with others, and that there is something seriously wrong
with their brain functioning.
In severe major depression, doing any kind of psychotherapy (short
of telling them, "take these pills") is a complete and utter waste of
time. Sufferers literally do not have the mental wherewithal to deal with any
kind of problem solving or other interactions with a therapist. And I say that as a major advocate of
psychotherapy.
The symptom of depression in dysthymic disorder, on the other
hand, rarely responds to antidepressant medication at all (although the drugs
can be useful for other symptoms seen in patients with dysthymia such as panic
attacks, obsessive ruminations, and the affective instability characteristic of
borderline personality disorder). For these folks, psychotherapy is essential.
In my experience a very high percentage of the people who do drug
and psychotherapy outcome studies, at least in adults, make almost no meaningful
effort to differentiate dysthymia from major depression by: 1) Not spending any
time making certain that patients understand the pervasiveness and persistence
criteria that differentiate the symptoms of the two disorders; and by 2) Not
taking a complete biopsychosocial history to distinguish psychological from
limbic system factors.
All of the fancy biological research is not being
complemented by good old fashioned clinical typing.
Furthermore, with the private Contract Research Organizations that do a lot of the studies,
experimenters get paid only if they recruit a subject, and subjects get paid only
if they get recruited - giving a financial incentive for everyone to exaggerate
symptoms in order to qualify.
And people with suicidal ideation, comorbid (other, co-occurring) conditions, and significant personality pathology are excluded from studies. Those "exclusions" eliminate the vast major of subjects that have any of the psychiatric disorders in which depression is a symptom.
Garbage in, garbage out.
And people with suicidal ideation, comorbid (other, co-occurring) conditions, and significant personality pathology are excluded from studies. Those "exclusions" eliminate the vast major of subjects that have any of the psychiatric disorders in which depression is a symptom.
Garbage in, garbage out.
By the way, you can also have something called double depression. Such people are
generally dysthymic but every so often can have a superimposed episode of major
depression. So they have both conditions.
Once a major depressive episode starts to occur, it takes on
a life of its own. However, being
chronically unhappy, anxious, or stressed out may be risk factors for triggering a major depressive episode to
begin with. If you are genetically
vulnerable to an episode of major depression, being chronically unhappy might make an episode more likely.
These
treatments address completely different aspects of the disorder. In major depressive disorder, drugs should be
used during the acute disorder, but psychotherapy should be given later to
address personality and relationship
risk factors - in order to reduce the likelihood of subsequent episodes.
I feel bad, but I didn't know I was vegetative. Oh well, viva la carrots!
ReplyDeleteAside from the more major and melancholic depression, are there diagnostic tests of any real value to distinguish between the less severe forms?
ReplyDeleteAs you probably know, there are unfortunately no lab tests as of yet that are specific to the vast majority of psych disorders. Good diagnosis depends very detailed clinical profiling and pattern matching.
DeleteIt's hardly foolproof, but it is fairly predictive of which types of treatment are going to be helpful in a given patient. And some diagnoses in the DSM are valid and well described, and in my opinion, some are not.
The brain is literally the most complicated object in the known universe, with a trillion or so constantly changing neural connections.
I'm learning so much, thank you.
ReplyDelete