As most
readers will know, opiate abuse and overdoses have increased dramatically in
recent years, and it’s all over the news. Some of the public may even be aware
of the role of drug companies and drug distributors in the process – the latter
being recently profiled on an episode of Sixty
Minutes. Let’s look at the role of the drug companies.
A Pharma executive, a billionaire, was arrested in October on charges of bribing doctors to prescribe opioid painkillers. (http://fortune.com/2017/10/26/john-kapoor-insys-therapeutics-arrested-net-worth/). The Department of Justice arrested Insys Therapeutics founder John Kapoor, 74, in Phoenix. Kapoor was charged with using bribes and fraud to prop up sales of a pain medication called Subsys, a fentanyl spray typically used to treat cancer patients suffering excruciating pain. Fentanyl is 50 to 100 stronger than morphine, and contributed to the overdose deaths of pop stars Prince and Tom Petty.
When it comes to drugs of abuse, the lunatics seem to have taken over the asylum in medicine these days. In their push towards huge profits, dangerous drugs are being hawked when cheaper, less toxic, and less addictive alternatives are available for treating some conditions. And as discussed in this blog, whole diseases such as “adult adhd” have been invented out of whole cloth.
For
those readers who may not know, potentially addictive drugs are referred to by
the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as “scheduled”
drugs. Schedule I drugs are the illegal ones. Schedule II drugs are those with
the highest abuse potential: narcotics and stimulants. Schedule IV drugs are those considered to be of low
potential for abuse. If you didn’t know how the drugs were scheduled, you
certainly would never know it from listening to presentations by doctors
working with Pharma.
Pharma hires doctors to do research on as well as give talks to other
doctors about their products, totally with the goal of increasing sales – if patients
do happen to benefit in some way, all the better – but that is hardly a
requirement. The slides that are presented during the talks are furnished entirely by the drug company after being approved internally; the doctors giving the talks are not allowed in most instances to use their own slides.
Pharma is particularly known for employing what they call “Key Opinion Leaders” (KOLs) to give promotional talks to doctors around the country. The more academic credibility they seem to have the better – that is one source of determining who might be a KOL. But it is not the only one.
Pharma is particularly known for employing what they call “Key Opinion Leaders” (KOLs) to give promotional talks to doctors around the country. The more academic credibility they seem to have the better – that is one source of determining who might be a KOL. But it is not the only one.
Pharma can actually get any given doctor’s prescribing records from the
pharmacy industry (unless the doctor “opts out” of allowing his or her data to
be mined in this way. Most docs are not even aware of this option—and having
the information publically available is the default position). Pharma then uses
this data to see if prescriptions for their products increase after one of
their KOLs makes a presentation.
Those doctors that make the best salesmen are
hired again and again, while those who do not measure up are dropped.
A colleague of
mine has taken a course required in Tennessee for licensure that discusses the “proper
way” to prescribe drugs of abuse. The
course was sponsored by our malpractice carrier. According to him, one year the
leader of the course scolded the doctors present for not prescribing enough opiates to people with chronic
pain.
The doctors were told how much suffering they were causing these patients
by withholding these medications. Just one year
later, after the “opioid crisis” hit the news, the same course was given. Only
this time, the doctors were scolded because they were prescribing these “suddenly” dangerous and highly addictive
substances to their patients with chronic pain!
I have discussed in previous posts how the risks of that class of medication (Schedule IV) have been wildly
overblown in the medical literature and in public news stories. As well as
being classified as “low abuse potential” by the DEA, they do not cause
intoxication, and have next to no side effects compared to just about any other
class of meds in most patients. I am not saying they are never abused, but
usually only by people that mix them with opiates and alcohol.
And of course
any individual can have a bad reaction to any drug. It seems benzo’s are never
discussed without the admonition that the “are addictive,” or have a few side
effects in (some) patients – while drugs like amphetamines (Schedule II) that
are abused far more often, and have more potential adverse or toxic side
effects, are enthusiastically pushed.
And I do mean
pushed, as in supplied by pushers masquerading as drug companies. I
recall a “grand rounds” (a major lecture at an academic department in a medical
school) from maybe 18-20 years ago in which the KOL was saying that about 18%
of all adults should be on high doses of speed, that the reason that many of
the parents of kids diagnosed with ADHD were substance abusers was because, "If
you had a kid with ADHD, you'd drink too," and that kids who had ADHD
could concentrate intensely on video games in an arcade despite multiple and pervasive
loud distractions all about because that is "not concentrating." (I
always wondered what the heck it supposedly was). I kid you not.
As
another amazing example of drug pushing, one news service for psychiatry called MDLinx devotes a whole e-mail newsletter to articles extolling the use and virtues of
drugs like Adderall and Concerta. Some recent examples:
MDLinx Psychiatry
3/13/18 - Ranked, sorted, and summarized by MDLinx
editors from the latest literature.
IN THE NEWS
SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts
effective, safe for ADHD in adults
Liz Meszaros, MDLinx, 03/08/2018
|
Paul Basilio, MDLinx, 02/23/2018
|
Study of 23,000 people links ADHD with genetic signature for
delay discounting. Paul
Basilio, MDLinx, 12/11/2017
|
They also have a section of their more general psychiatric
newsletters also devoted to this goal that is called the ADHD Resource Center: A collection of
articles and features related to ADHD with articles like:
National
Conference & Exhib Conference
Of
course, none of these Pharma sales mechanisms would matter that much if there
were not already a ready market for abusable medications. That market is
growing, and adverse childhood experiences and family dysfunction are a huge
part of that problem.
Still,
as Steppenwolf used to sing, “G-d damn the pusher man.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment