Woody
Allen wins the Golden Globe’s Cecil B. Demille Award for his life’s work from
the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, and an old family war is rekindled for
all the public to see. Mia Farrow, Woody's ex girlfriend, criticized the award because of an old accusation that Woody Allen had molested his
then seven year old daughter. Then the now
27 year old woman, Dylan Farrow, publishes her own open letter to the New York
Times describing in detail what she alleges happened to her:
|
Dylan Farrow |
Her
description is quite detailed and very much consistent with a lot of stories from abuse victims
that I have heard over the years.
I would first like to say unequivocally that the biggest problem in this country is not that false accusations of child abuse by those
claiming to be incest victims are believed, but that the true ones are not. The
best studies indicate that about 95% of such claims by adults turn out to be basically
true, despite many specific details being recalled erroneously. It’s easy to confuse a blue shirt with a
black one or a morning for an afternoon, for example, but one is not likely to get being raped mixed up with
taking a trip to the supermarket.
But
what about that other 5%? The false
accusations? It used to be that overzealous therapists pressured their more suggestible
patients into “admitting” to having been abused under the nonsensical premise
than anyone suffering from one psychological disorder or another simply must have been abused. Well, a few
malpractice suits later, that phenomenon seems to have abated.
The
most common situation in which false accusations are made at present is during hotly-contested, super-nasty divorces with child custody being a bone of contention. Such false accusations are tied in with the phenomenon of parental alienation, in which one parent who maintains primary
custody fills a child’s head with vicious lies and half-truths about the other
parent. Parents who put their kids in
the middle of their messy relationships like that are just as deserving of
condemnation as a child abuser, because doing so is indeed a form of psychological child abuse.
Which is what makes the Woody Allen case so interesting.
Before Miss Farrow had her most recent say,
Oscar nominated and Emmy winning film director Robert B. Weide
published a story that had some possibly damning information in it about the
whole sordid mess.
Now,
I am not claiming to know the truth in the case. Repeat, I am not claiming to know the truth
about what may or may not have happened to Miss Farrow. I can only make some general comments about
publically available information, which never tells the whole story. As to Mr. Weide’s article, IF IT
IS ALL TRUE AND COMPLETE (I’ll be repeating a version of that phrase
several times, since some readers will undoubtedly not catch it the first few
times), I can point out that there are an awful lot of the most typical indicators of a
false accusation absolutely aglow in this story, at least as reported by the
author of the piece.
Still,
this does not necessarily mean that the accusations are false, or that Mr.
Allen (no relation) is telling the truth about being innocent. Repeat, nothing
discussed in this post proves anything one way or the other.
If
you want to know how children can be induced to tell adults whatever the adults
want to hear, I recommend a movie called
Indictment: the McMartin Trial, about
a preschool scandal in Southern California in the early 1980’s. The alleged abusers were all eventually
exonerated, but not before overzealous social workers elicited highly detailed stories from the
children that were believed in spite of there being absolutely no evidence that
they ever occurred, and which defied credulity in the first place. Like a story of a class field trip to the
set of a pornographic movie.
At
the time of the original allegations made by Woody Allen’s
girlfriend-at-the-time Mia Farrow, Woody was having an inappropriate affair with Mia’s
adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn. Mia allegedly
found out about the affair when she found naked pictures of her
daughter taken by Woody. An affair with
her own daughter! (Soon-Yi was at least
19 at the time, and Woody Allen’s extent of “parental” involvement was taking
the girl to the occasional basketball game, so it is not true that he was her
stepfather. Mia and Woody did not live
together, were never married, and Soon-Yi’s adopted father was Andre Previn).
So,
as Mr. Weide points out, “It’s understandable that
Mia would remain furious with Woody for the rest of her life.” She would have reason to suspect Woody of the
worst possible behavior. Of course, she herself
was an admitted cheater who apparently had more than one affair herself during
her life. Maybe Woody was the one who
got angry first. Who knows? The point is that there was a lot of anger
involved in this break up, which makes this fertile ground for possible
parental alienation behavior on Mia’s part.
According
to the article by Weide,
On
August 4, 1992, almost four months after the revelation about Woody and
Soon-Yi’s relationship understandably ignited a firestorm within the Farrow
household, Woody was visiting Frog Hollow, the Farrow country home in
Bridgewater, Connecticut, where Mia and several of her kids were staying.
During an unsupervised moment, Woody allegedly took Dylan into the attic and,
shall we say, “touched her inappropriately.” Later in the day, it was alleged
that the child was wearing her sundress, but that her underpants were missing.
The following day, Mia’s daughter allegedly told her mother what had happened,
and Mia put the child’s recounting of the story on videotape as evidence...
If
Mia’s account is true, it means that in the middle of custody and support
negotiations, during which Woody needed to be on his best behavior, in a house
belonging to his furious ex-girlfriend, and filled with people seething mad at
him, Woody, who is a well-known claustrophobic, decided this would be the ideal
time and place to take his daughter into an attic and molest her, quickly,
before a house full of children and nannies noticed they were both missing...
As
for the evidentiary videotape of young Dylan’s claims, it’s been noted that
there were several starts and stops in the recording, essentially creating
in-camera “edits” to the young girl’s commentary. This raises questions as to
what was happening when the tape wasn’t running. Was Mia “coaching” her
daughter off-camera, as suggested by the investigators? Mia says no—she merely
turned the camera on whenever Dylan starting talking about what Daddy did.
Maybe we should take Mia at her word on this. Since I wasn’t there, I think
it’s good policy not to presume what took place...
A New
York Times article dated March 26, 1993, quotes from Mia’s own testimony, during which she recalled
taking the child to a doctor on the same day as the alleged incident. Farrow
recalled, “I think (Dylan) said (Allen) touched her, but when asked where, she
just looked around and went like this,” at which point Mia patted her
shoulders. Farrow recalls she took Dylan to another doctor, four days later. On
the stand, Allen’s attorney asked Mia about the second doctor’s findings:
“There was no evidence of injury to the anal or vaginal area, is that correct?”
Farrow answered, “Yes.”...
Former
nanny Monica Thompson (whose salary was paid by Allen, since three of the brood
were also his) swore in a deposition to Allen’s attorneys that she was
pressured by Farrow to support the molestation charges, and the pressure led
her to resign her position. Thompson had this to say about the videotape: ““I
know that the tape was made over the course of at least two and perhaps three
days. I recall Ms. Farrow saying to Dylan at that time, ‘Dylan, what did daddy
do… and what did he do next?’ Dylan appeared not to be interested, and Ms.
Farrow would stop taping for a while and then continue.”...
Dr.
John Leventhal further swears Dylan’s statements at the hospital contradicted
each other as well as the story she told on the videotape. “Those were not
minor inconsistencies. She told us initially that she hadn’t been touched in
the vaginal area, and she then told us that she had, then she told us that she
hadn’t.” He also said the child’s accounts had “a rehearsed quality.” At one
point, she told him, “I like to cheat on my stories.”
And then there was this quote from Moses Farrow - Dylan's brother, also adopted, and now a 36-year-old family therapist: "My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister," Moses Farrow, 36, told People Magazine. "And I hated him for her for years. I see now that this was a vengeful way to pay him back for falling in love with Soon-Yi." He added, "Pleasing my mother was very powerful motivation [for Dylan] because to be on her wrong side was horrible."
Dylan called her brother's statement a betrayal.
It’s
also interesting that Mia Farrow’s brother, John Charles Villiers-Farrow, has
been convicted of multiple counts of child molestation. Mia may have exposed her children to him, so
maybe there is a perp that is not Woody.
These observations, if true and complete, raise some serious
questions about whether Dylan might be being loyal to her mother
by repeating her not-really-true story in the press after her mother brought the subject back
to public attention after the Golden Globes.
So, after reading this, anyone who thinks that Dylan’s accusation simply must be true or simply must be false is either highly defensive, blinded by anger, or a simpleton. No offense.
As
someone who has studied dysfunctional families for almost 40 years, and who
specializes in helping adults who were abused by attachment figures as children
successfully confront their abusers, I want to add a few more random random
thoughts about the case:
1. While reporting ongoing child abuse to the
police and prosecuting the perp to the full extent of the law is absolutely
essential, airing dirty laundry in public this long after the fact is almost
always counterproductive for the victim. Victims may think they would feel a lot better if they get either revenge or
just plain old justice for the perpetrator, and they may for a short time. But they are still left with a gaping hole in
their soul where their family should be, and they often still have great
difficulty self actualizing, or successfully charting their own course in life. As my readers know, I recommend that my
patients work with me to discover ways to get past their family member’s
formidable defenses and confront the issues involved head on.
2. There's ALWAYS more to the story that abuse
victims and other family members tell people about - even people who know them
very well, let alone strangers or the public. Sometimes my patients leave out essentials of their experiences for
MONTHS into therapy.
Victims of child abuse are much more likely to hide their parent's behavior than they are to exaggerate it.
3. That Dylan Farrow came from a highly
dysfunctional background that harmed her seems to be a near certainty, but the details that
we know about this case raise a lot more questions than they answer about what
actually happened.
Events in a family can be lied about out of loyalty by one family member to another. I would certainly want to ask
about Dylan's relationship with her mother. If Dylan was abused, that means that Mia failed to protect her daughter
in this case. Many abuse victims are more angry with the non-protective parent than
with the abuser! Sometimes that anger is
covered up. In a reaction formation, the person obsessively loves and/or idolizes
the person she's really furious with. (Not
saying it's true, but if Mia coached Dylan and pressured
her to make the accusation, this could create a LOT of interesting scenarios).
That
some of the Mia's children are angry with her seems likely. As I mentioned
earlier, it was reported that Mia found out about Woody's relationship with
Soon Yi by finding nude pictures of her around the house, taken by Woody. If this is true, why would Soon Yi,
who was an adult at the time, have a sexual relationship with her own mother's
boyfriend and then conveniently leave evidence about it lying around the house
for Mom to find? (Did she leave it
around accidentally? Bullshit). If this is true, then to surmise
that Soon Yi is really pissed with her mother is probably a safe bet. Why
is she so angry? That would be an
interesting story.
I
also find it fascinating that Soon Yi seems to get a free pass on her
relationship with Woody – she married him and adopted children with him and
they are still together - from all the people who are absolutely certain that
Woody is a pedophile.
We
also know by her own admission and a pregnancy that there was cheating in Mia's
past, and families in which infidelity is the norm create a lot of chaos for
children. Certainly child sexual abuse could also be present, but it would just as certainly
not be required for this "family" to be severely dysfunctional.