Why aren’t many kids seemingly growing up as maturely as they used to any more? Why are mental health problems and suicidal ideation as well as actually suicides increasing? Why are more and more children losing self confidence and feeling defective?
In a new book by Abigail Shrier, Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing up, the author blames the mental health establishment. So does the parenting guru I’ve been reading for years, John Rosemond. And psychologists are indeed a big part of the problem. But both miss an important aspect of the phenomenon.
The definition of “traumatized” in children has been expanded beyond all recognition by the profession. In the mental health field, consideration of the effects of adverse childhood experiences have gone back and forth from one extreme to the other: the serious ones at times are almost completely ignored. At other times child abuse was thought to be everywhere. And now trauma is seen as almost any occurrence that makes a kid in the least bit unhappy or stressed.
I described what has been going on at the college level in my review of the book, The Coddling of the American Mind, with students' reactions to “microaggressions,” and political incorrectnesss being equated with PTSD caused by a terrifying combat experience.
Nowadays, according to Shrier, kids are
seen as being unable to put aside even hurt feelings in order to concentrate on
the school work in front of them. Resilience is now seen as “accepting” these
“traumas” rather than dealing with them in a potent manner. Personal agency has seemed
to have “snuck out the back door.”
And 40% of the current, rising
generation has received psych treatment versus 26% of gen-X’ers when they were
younger. More and more phony psych diagnoses are put on kids, often at the
suggestion of teachers. More and more children are afraid to be wrong in school
laboratories or to test new ideas for fear of making a mistake. Bullies
are being suspended less and less frequently for fear of damaging their self esteem.
American children are more likely than others to exaggerate all kinds of risks.
For those mental health professionals who do recognize all this as a problem, the usual explanation for why it is happening is that when parents and teachers over-protect and over-pathologize their children, they are preventing them from learning social skills which, it is believed, cannot be “taught” in most cases but must be learned through trial and error.
If a
parent always steps in, or even when parents don’t let their children go out to
play or walk to school because they believe that something bad will happen to
them, the kids are said to never get the chance to learn those things. As the author also
points out, sometimes feeling mildly to moderately anxious or moody can be a
good thing since it can motivate kids to evaluate their situation and lead them to
take action.
Now don’t get me wrong. There is
much truth to these assertions. What’s missing, however, is the way this sort
of treatment by parents and teachers is interpreted by the children themselves. The children start to see
themselves as a big burden to their over-anxious, worrying parents. Not
only that, but the parents seem angry about it. I believe that if a child feels
like too big a burden to their parents, they may start to think their parents
would be better off without them. This could increase their risk of suicide.
Why? Because, as I have been arguing
for years, children are willing to sacrifice their own best interests in order
to stabilize their parents. This is due to the evolutionary force called kin
selection. It is not just that kids don’t experiment with new behavior in
order to figure out how to, say, respond to a bully. Hell, there are TV shows, YouTube channels, and many other sources for suggestions that they could try out at school. But as long as they feel the need to let their parents take
care of them, they are not motivated to become independent. "Enabling" parents
lead to co-dependent children.
Schrier does allude to this aspect of the process involved here, but it is not clear to me that she
truly appreciates the extent of the issue. She does say that kids often feel
responsible for their parents, and may feel like a “constant burden to their
stricken parents.” She also says that there is nothing scarier to them than
parents “overmatched and afraid.” She has also noticed that people who make parenting
look exhausting do not seem all that fond of the kids they raised. If an untrained observer like the author can see this, then guess what? So can the children. And they will be induced
to make any necessary sacrifice.